How a Writer with 800 Subscribers Makes More Money Than Someone with 15,000
Most writers get this wrong (here's what really works)
I just watched a writer with 800 subscribers make more money last month than someone with 15,000.
The difference wasn't their writing quality. It wasn't their niche. It wasn't luck. It was understanding what Substack actually is and what it isn't.
→ Same platform. Similar content quality. Vastly different results.
But the 800-subscriber writer gets it: Substack isn't social media. It's not a blog. It's a business engine. The 15K writer is still treating it like Twitter with a paywall.
And that's the mistake 90% of writers are making right now.
The misunderstanding that's costing you money
Most writers approach Substack like this:
"I'll write great content, build an audience, and eventually figure out how to make money from it."
That's backwards.
The profitable writers start with: "What business am I building, and how does my content serve that business?"
It's a completely different game. Let me give you the concrete example.
Writer A (800 subscribers):
Positioned as "The email marketing strategist for coaches"
Every post teaches something actionable about email marketing
Offers 1-on-1 strategy sessions at $300/hour
Gets 2-3 clients per month from newsletter readers
Monthly revenue: $3,200+
Writer B (15,000 subscribers):
Writes "thoughts on life, creativity, and finding your path"
Posts personal reflections and general inspiration
Has a $5/month paid tier with "bonus content"
Gets maybe 50 paid subscribers
Monthly revenue: $250
Same platform. Same writing skills. One treats it like a business development tool. The other treats it like a personal blog.
Guess who's actually building something sustainable?
The three types of Substack writers
After watching hundreds of creators on the platform, I've noticed they fall into three categories:
Type 1: The Hobbyists
Write about whatever interests them that day
Hope good content will "eventually" find its audience
Treat paid subscriptions as tip jars
Wonder why growth is slow and revenue is nonexistent
Type 2: The Performers
Chase Notes engagement like it's Twitter
Write click-bait headlines for short-term attention
Burn out trying to feed the content machine
Build audiences that don't convert to anything meaningful
Type 3: The Strategists
Use Substack as their professional home base
Create content that positions them as experts
Have clear offers that serve their audience
Turn their newsletter into real business opportunities
Only Type 3 makes actual money.
What the profitable writers understand
They know that Substack isn't only about building an audience, it's about building authority.
Every post they publish serves one of three purposes:
Demonstrates expertise in their specific area
Provides genuine value that readers can implement
Builds trust with their ideal customers
They're not trying to go viral. They're trying to go valuable.
They write for word-of-mouth, not algorithm.
They create content so useful that readers naturally share it with people who need to know about their work.
The positioning that changes everything
The difference between making $250/month and $3,200/month often comes down to one thing: how clearly you position yourself.
Instead of: "I write about marketing"
Try: "I help SaaS founders write emails that convert"
Instead of: "I share my creative journey"
Try: "I teach designers how to price their work confidently"
Instead of: "I write about productivity and life optimization"
Try: "I help entrepreneurs build systems that scale without burnout"
See the difference?
The first examples are about you. The second examples are about what you do for other people.
The profitable writers always lead with the value they provide, not the topics they're interested in.
How to actually use Substack like a business
Stop thinking of your newsletter as a content publication.
Start thinking of it as:
→ Your expertise showcase — where prospects can see exactly what you know and how you think
→ Your relationship builder — where you provide value before asking for anything
→ Your opportunity magnet — what drives consulting inquiries, speaking gigs, and client requests
→ Your business foundation — the asset that supports everything else you're building
The goal isn't just any subscriber. It's the right subscribers. People who could become customers, collaborators, or champions of your work.
The revenue models that actually work
Forget "premium content" and tip jar mentalities.
Here's what's working for profitable newsletter writers:
High-ticket services ($500-5000): Consulting, coaching, done-for-you services
Digital products ($50-500): Courses, templates, guides, workshops
Speaking & partnerships (~$1000): Corporate training, conference talks, brand collaborations
Community & masterminds ($100-1000/month): Private groups, accountability programs
Notice what's missing? $5/month subscriptions for bonus posts.
The profitable writers use their free content to attract their ideal customers, then serve them with high-value offers that actually move the needle.
Your next move 🚀
If you've been treating Substack like a hobby blog or social media platform, it's time to shift your approach.
The writers who understand this are building sustainable businesses while everyone else argues about algorithm changes and subscriber counts.
The opportunity is still massive. Most writers are still figuring it out, which means there's space for you to position yourself strategically and build something real.
But you need to know what you're doing. Let me help you shape your vision and strategy.
Because the difference between the 800-subscriber writer making $3,200 and the 15K writer making $250 isn't talent.
It's strategy.
Question for you Claudia—do you think a Substack built mainly around personal storytelling/entertainment can actually be monetised? I write around three themes and love it, but I’m not sure I’m “solving” anything for my readers. I want to stay authentic and tell my story, but I also wonder if that can realistically turn into growth and income.
Hi Claudia
This analysis works well for people who see themselves first and foremost as building a business.
Those who see themselves as freelance writers who want to get an agent and then a publisher (we need to do it in that order in the U.K.) first and foremost, but who have not yet published their fiction or their non fiction with agents don’t quite fit into this model you describe. It isn’t just a hobby for some. It is much more.
Many people want to publish their writing, have some other unconnected source of income on the side to help with the bills, but ultimately want to find an agent for their fiction, memoir etc. That is why they are here - to connect with others like them, build connections, get creative ideas, and build exposure or audiences if they do get the agent. Many are submitting book proposals alongside the articles.
I never see strategies for growth with those who see themselves in this category. Doing the kind of writing they want to do has to be a PT occupation for financial reasons, rather than their only occupation. Realistically people are unlikely to pay for courses or even subscriptions etc until they get published and a bit more established as a writer. So they are not looking to monetise at least not yet - because that might not yet be realistic. Unless you think it still is in that context ?